USPTO serial 75933306
VADER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VADER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARKSTE 300624 NINTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATION MACHINE OR EQUIPMENT AND THEIR PARTS, NAMELY TELEPHONE MACHINES, RADIO COMMUNICATION MACHINES, LOUDSPEAKERS AND MICROPHONES; AND ELECTRONIC APPLIED MACHINES OR EQUIPMENT AND THEIR PARTS, NAMELY COMPUTERS, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS, PROGRAMMED-DATA-ENCODED CIRCUITS, BLANK MAGNETIC DISCS AND TAPES AND COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |