Drawing for WITH ZEON TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75933342

WITH ZEON TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WITH ZEON TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH E. SHARKIN

KEITH E SHARKIN KING & SPALDING1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005insecticides and preparations for destroying pests for use agriculture, forestry and the public health sectorACTIVEApr 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 20, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 14, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 14, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 3, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance