Drawing for POAHAR CTOPOHA YCYRN PEAOCTABRIOTCR AIRNEX COMMUNICATIONS JITA

USPTO serial 75933364

POAHAR CTOPOHA YCYRN PEAOCTABRIOTCR AIRNEX COMMUNICATIONS JITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POAHAR CTOPOHA YCYRN PEAOCTABRIOTCR AIRNEX COMMUNICATIONS JITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely provision of long distance telephone services, telephone call-back services, telecommunications connections to a global computer network, IP telephony services, paging services, cellular telephone services, wireless telephone services, and satellite telephone servicesACTIVEDec 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 9, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 21, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance