USPTO serial 75933571
HEADSTRONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3018139Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 2005
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEADSTRONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHERTSEY, SURREY KT16 BAY, GB
Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 8AY, GB
Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 8AY, GB
London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
Heidi L. Sachs PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely manuals, pamphlets, brochures, books and booklets relating to planning, computer analysis, computer systems design services, business reengineering, software development and e-commerce | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 11, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HEADSTRONG WORLDWIDE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by James Martin Worldwide PLC
- Other trademarks owned by James Martin Worldwide PLC
- Other trademarks owned by HEADSTRONG WORLDWIDE LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HEADSTRONG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |