USPTO serial 75933815
POKER JACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POKER JACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernhard Kreten
BERNHARD KRETEN BERNHARD KRETEN ESQ & ASSOCIATES1331 GARDEN HWY STE 300SACRAMENTO, CA 95833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GAMING DEVICES, NAMELY GAMING MACHINES AND COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE THEREFORE FOR USE IN A GAMING ENVIRONMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |