Drawing for INTERNET2ANYWHERE

USPTO serial 75933961

INTERNET2ANYWHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERNET2ANYWHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Gary LaFever

M GARY LAFEVER13201 BEN NEVIS COURTHERNDON, VA 20171-4053UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROVIDING CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND THE INTERNET; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC STORE AND FORWARD MESSAGING AND NOTIFICATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC STORAGE AND NOTIFICATION OF EVENTS TO SUBSCRIBERS IN AN ON-LINE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC MAIL TO PERSONAL COMPUTERS, TELEPHONES, MOBILE TELEPHONES, FACSIMILE MACHINES AND PAGERS; COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
038SERVICES RELATING TO THE PROVISION OF CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN PERSONAL COMPUTERS TO THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; MESSAGING AND NOTIFICATION; NOTIFICATION OF EVENTS TO SUBSCRIBERS IN A NETWORK; ON-LINE AND OFF-LINE NOTIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRONIC MAIL TO PERSONAL COMPUTERS, TELEPHONES, MOBILE TELEPHONES, FACSIMILE MACHINES AND PAGERS; AND FOR THE IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY, ACCOMMODATION AND EXPANSION OF E-COMMERCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance