USPTO serial 75934000
VIRTUAL ASSETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL ASSETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Priddy,
ROBERT R PRIDDY HALL, PRIDDY, MYERS & VANDE SANDE10220 RIVER RD STE 200POTOMAC, MD 20854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consulting services, namely, consulting with respect to the design, establishment and administration of asset management systems; licensing of asset management systems; clearinghouses for facilitating transactions; maintaining escrow accounts for private, commercial and governmental entities; business management services, namely, operating a system for assigning names, addresses and communications paths through which business accounts interact; business management, namely, providing and maintaining the registration of names and identifications for accounts and devices, including computers, personal digital assistants, pagers and cellular phones; operating a system for labeling accounts; business management, namely, account management and asset management; business management, namely, providing and maintaining gaming and gambling accounts; auction account management | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | consulting services, namely, consulting with respect to the design, establishment and administration of financial asset management systems; licensing of financial asset management systems; clearinghouses for facilitating financial transactions; providing and maintaining escrow accounts for private, commercial and government financial transactions; financial management services, namely, operating a system for assigning names, addresses, and communications paths through which financial accounts interact; operating a system for labeling financial accounts; financial account management; financial asset management; financial management, namely, providing and maintaining gaming and gambling financial accounts; financial management in connection with auction accounts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |