USPTO serial 75934095
LEGALOPINION.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEGALOPINION.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE M. GREEN
BRUCE M GREEN OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA480 THE STATION601 W CORDOVA STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ONLINE DIRECTORY SERVICES OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR LINKING CLIENTS TO LAWYERS QUALIFIED IN A PARTICULAR FIELD OF LAW AND JURISDICTION FOR PURPOSES OF PROVIDING LEGAL CONSULTATION; MAINTAINING AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO A WEB SITE FOR THE PROVISION OF LAW-RELATED INFORMATION | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |