USPTO serial 75934132
EXCLUSIVELY CAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2882000Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2004
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXCLUSIVELY CAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Cooper
JEFFREY A COOPER STUPAR, SCHUSTER & COOPER, SC633 W WISCONSIN AVE STE 1800MILWAUKEE, WI 53203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | foodstuffs for animals, specifically cat treats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |