USPTO serial 75934177
POLAROID INSTANT DIGITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLAROID INSTANT DIGITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Heisler Lavalley
LEE J EULGEN NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60602-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photographic cameras; digital imaging devices; namely, digital cameras, cellular telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), digital viewers, digital picture frames used for displaying digital photographs, Internet appliances for photo viewing, manipulation, and printing of images; photographic printers and digital printers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |