USPTO serial 75934196
UB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | recording discs; CD-ROMs; sound recordings, whether or not coupled with a visual image, including phonograph records, compact discs, cassettes, video and other pre-recorded tapes and cassettes; sunglasses, glasses cases, cords, chains, and ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |