USPTO serial 75934237
PROTECT-O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROTECT-O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy E. Sasamoto
NANCY E SASAMOTO MASUDA FUNAI EIFERT & MITCHELL LTDONE E WACKER DR STE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60601-2002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | PAINTS AND OTHER COATINGS, NAMELY ENAMEL AND ACRYLIC PAINTS AND GLAZES USED IN REFINISHING OF METAL SIDING, ROOFS, SIDEWALLS AND METAL ARCHITECTURAL PANELS FOR BUILDINGS | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 1994 |
| 040 | REFINISHING AND PAINTING OF METAL SIDING, ROOFS, SIDEWALLS AND METAL ARCHITECTURAL PANELS | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |