Drawing for CGI WORLDWIDE

USPTO serial 75934240

CGI WORLDWIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CGI WORLDWIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric H. Weimers

ERIC H WEIMERS JENNER & BLOCKONE IBM PLZCHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF MARKETING STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT, HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, DEBT MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, INVESTOR RELATIONS, STRATEGIC NETWORKING, BUSINESS PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS FINANCINGACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA THE INTERNET, AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 1, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 3, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance