USPTO serial 75934330
REAL INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REAL INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST N W STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CLASSES, COURSES AND SEMINARS AT THE ADULT EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL LEVEL, PROVIDING VOCATIONAL TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY; PROVIDING SKILLS DEVELOPMENT TRAINING IN THE AREAS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATING TO ALL OF THESE AFOREMENTIONED FIELDS OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL FORMS OF MEDIA; PROVIDING PUBLISHING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ADULT EDUCATION, VOCATIONAL TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |