USPTO serial 75934357
DANKAWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DANKAWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie S Spitalney
CAROL JEAN LOCICERO HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPPO BOX 1288TAMPA, FL 33601-1288UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail and wholesale distributorship in the field of automated office equipment, parts, and supplies, namely, photocopiers, full color photocopiers, thermal and plain paper facsimile machines, computers, computer hardware, computer accessories, typewriters, word processors, printers, laser printers, microfiche duplicators, erasable writing boards with photocopy capability, micrographic equipment, electronic messaging systems, multifunctional and multitasking office machines which serve as facsimile machines, copiers, printers, modems, and scanners, and parts and supplies therefor; and rental and leasing of word processors services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | rental and leasing of computer hardware, computer accessories printers and laser printers services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |