USPTO serial 75934400
DUAL DRY OMEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUAL DRY OMEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell D. Bittman
MITCHELL D BITTMAN SEQUA CORPORATIONPATENT LAW DEPTTHREE UNIVERSITY PLZHACKENSACK, NJ 07601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Dryers for drying and conditioning webs integrated with incineration apparatus for destroying volatile organic compounds and air toxics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |