USPTO serial 75934431
GENERATION MD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENERATION MD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRISHA A. DORE
TRISHA A DORE COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICESP O BOX 12109 STE 2200 555 W HASTING STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 4N6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing healthcare information over a global computer network; offering interactive symposiums over a global network; distribution of pharmaceutical samples | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |