USPTO serial 75934477
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Harvey
GORDON K WRIGHT COOPER & SCULLY, PC900 JACKSON ST STE 100DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | antiperspirants; astringents for cosmetic purposes; bath oils; bath powders; non-medicated bath salts; beauty masks; blushers; body creams; body oils; body powders; breath freshener; bubble bath; skin cleansing lotions; cold creams; cosmetics compact; cosmetic pencils; hair removing creams; night creams; skin cleansing creams; skin creams; vanishing creams; cuticle removing preparations; deodorant soaps; personal deodorants; depilatory creams; hair dyes; essential oils for personal use; eye makeup; eye makeup removers; eye pencils; eye shadows; eyebrow pencils; eyeliners; face powders; foundation make ups; hair gels; tooth gels; lip glosses; non-medicated hair care preparations; hair cleaning preparations; hair conditioners; hair dressings for men; hair rinses; hairs sprays; hair styling preparations; lipsticks; body lotions; hair lotions; makeup; mascara; massage oils; nail grooming products, namely, nail buffing preparations, nail enamels, nail hardeners, nail polishes, nail polish base coats, nail polish removers, nail polish top coats, and nail strengtheners; hair pomades; potpourri; talcum powders; non-medicated foot powders; rouges; skin clarifiers; skin lighteners; skin lotions; skin soaps; toilet soaps; skin toners | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |