Drawing for STOCKHOLM NO. 1

USPTO serial 75934481

STOCKHOLM NO. 1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STOCKHOLM NO. 1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald J. Roerty, Jr.

GERALD J ROERTY JR SWEDISH MATCH N AMERICA INCP O BOX 132977300 BEAUFONT SPRINGS DR STE 400RICHMOND, VA 23225

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034SNUFFACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 30, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 22, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 5, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 30, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance