USPTO serial 75934749
THE LEARNING REVOLUTION INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE LEARNING REVOLUTION INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) PRE-RECORDED VIDEOS, CD-R0MS, AUDIOTAPES, CDS, FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on Use in Commerce) PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FIELDS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING | ACTIVE | Jul 28, 1997 |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING SEMINARS AND PROVIDING SCHOOLS AND COURSES IN THE FIELDS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING AND DISTRIBUTION OF COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK IN THE FIELDS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DR. JEANNETTE VOS
- Other trademarks owned by DR. JEANNETTE VOS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE LEARNING REVOLUTION INTERNATIONAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |