USPTO serial 75934798
DRIVING E-BUSINESS TO M-BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRIVING E-BUSINESS TO M-BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID L. MCCOMBS
DAVID L MCCOMBS HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP901 MAIN ST STE 3100DALLAS, TX 75202-3789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hand-held wireless devices, computers, and computer software for facilitating communication between the hand-held wireless devices and computers | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 2000 |
| 038 | providing telecommunications services, namely providing connection to a global computer network via hand-held wireless devices | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 2000 |
| 042 | Application service provider services, namely, hosting computer software on a computer server for others for distribution to hand-held wireless devices; Providing computer software for providing a connection between hand-held wireless devices and a global computer network, connecting hand-held wireless devices, allowing access to email, and providing mobile web portal and hosting services | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |