Drawing for IATMNETWORK

USPTO serial 75934901

IATMNETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IATMNETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James H. Walters

JAMES H WALTERS DELLETT AND WALTERSSTE 1101310 SW 4TH AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 2, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 12, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 12, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 25, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 23, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 6, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance