Drawing for STEELBUILDING.COM

USPTO serial 75934927

STEELBUILDING.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEELBUILDING.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL M. ZADROZNY

MICHAEL M. ZADROZNY GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 30003000 THANKSGIVING TOWERDALLAS, TX 75201-4761

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SALE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PRE-ENGINEERED STEEL BUILDINGS AND ROOFING SYSTEMSACTIVESep 29, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 25, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 9, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 4, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 26, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 16, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 5, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 1, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 1, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 18, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 15, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 7, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance