Drawing for THE ECONOMIST

USPTO serial 75935674

THE ECONOMIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ECONOMIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard B. Rockman

HOWARD B ROCKMAN BARNES & THORNBURGPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of a magazine in the field of business news and information relating to the overall management of business entities; computer software for use in business management; multimedia software recorded on CD roms related to business news and business management; floppy discs for computers; prerecorded audio tapes featuring business news; and prerecorded video tapes featuring news related to businessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 12, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance