USPTO serial 75935913
B2A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B2A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roxanne E. Morgan
ROXANNE E MORGAN I2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC1170 1 LUNA RDDALLAS, TX 75234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Electronic purchasing via a global computer network for the exchange of goods between businesses to optimize supply planning, demand forecasting, inventory policy and control, production scheduling, ordering purchase planning and distribution planning; and electronic sales, consultation and implementation services for information regarding procurement over a global computer network for the exchange of services between businesses to optimize scheduling, planning, manufacturing and transportation, namely demand forecasting, inventory policy, production scheduling, purchase planning and distribution planning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |