Drawing for INTRUSION.COM

USPTO serial 75936193

INTRUSION.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2703281Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 2003
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INTRUSION.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

DARREN W COLLINS PATTON BOGGS LLP1660 LINCOLN ST STE 2050DENVER, CO 80264UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SECURITY SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF DATA AND NETWORK SECURITY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DETECTING UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS AND ATTEMPTS TO ACCESS AND MISUSE COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; AND COMPUTER SECURITY SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MONITORING THE DATA INTEGRITY OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITHSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 17, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2009C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 7, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 7, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 21, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 8, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 31, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance