USPTO serial 75936232
ERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2003
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-33334 Gutersloh, DE
D-33334 Gutersloh, DE
D-33334 Gutersloh, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH F. FLOREK, ESQ.
Kenneth F. Florek FLOREK & ANDRES PLLC1156 Avenue of the AmericasSuite 600New York, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | BUILDING MATERIALS OF METAL, NAMELY, AIR TRANSFER DUCTS AND DUCT LINERS; NON-ELECTRIC CABLES AND WIRES OF COMMON METAL; IRONMONGERY, NAMELY, SMALL ITEMS OF METAL HARDWARE, NAMELY, WIRE CLAMPS AND BAND CLAMPS; TUBES OF METAL, NAMELY, FLEXIBLE, SEMI-FLEXIBLE AND RIGID TUBES OF METAL; GOODS OF COMMON METAL, NAMELY, UNION COUPLINGS FOR PIPES AND TUBES, NAMELY, SLEEVES, MUFFS, FLANGES, FLANGE SLEEVES, FLANGE MUFFS; PARTS OF VENTILATION INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, METAL DUCTS AND FITTINGS, NAMELY, FLEXIBLE, SEMI-FLEXIBLE AND RIGID DUCTS; STAINLESS-STEEL DUCTS AND VENTILATION DUCTS FOR OIL TANKS; GOODS MADE OF METAL, NAMELY, CONNECTIONS FOR DUCTS, NAMELY, CLAMPS, SPIGOTS, CASINGS, MUFFS, FLANGES, FLANGE SLEEVES AND FLANGE MUFFS, RIGID, SEMI-FLEXIBLE AND FLEXIBLE DUCT SECTIONS, NOISE SUPPRESSION ELEMENTS, NAMELY, DUCT-LIKE SILENCERS FOR AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS; METAL AIR-SOURCE OUTLETS, CHIMNEYS, EXHAUST DUCTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | WEATHER PROTECTION VENTILATING LOUVERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Westa-Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Westa-Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Westa-Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ERO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |