Drawing for IFORCE

USPTO serial 75936259

IFORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IFORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

SALLY M ABEL ESQ FENWICK & W LLP801 CALIFORNIA STSILICON VALLEY CTRMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation and repair of computers, computer networks and computer systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 28, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2002IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Apr 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance