USPTO serial 75936304
BLACK KNIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK KNIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich LADAS & PARRY LLP224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVESTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather goods, namely, travel bags; beach bags; overnight cases; travelling trunks; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; sitting sticks; canes; whips, harnesses and saddler | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |