USPTO serial 75936312
FATHERS COUNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FATHERS COUNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Meyer
JAMES R MEYER SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4252UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | philanthropic services, namely providing grants for charitable projects that benefit disadvantaged children and their families | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing information on issues affecting disadvantaged children and their families; or promoting public awareness of the need to provide aid to disadvantaged children and their families | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Annie E. Casey Foundation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Annie E. Casey Foundation, The
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FATHERS COUNT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |