USPTO serial 75936541
FIPSOC THE FIELD PROGRAMMABLE SYSTEM-ON-CHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIPSOC THE FIELD PROGRAMMABLE SYSTEM-ON-CHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SIDSA SEMIDCONDUCTORES INVESTIGACION Y DISENO, S.A. ( A SOCIEDAD ANONIMA COMPANY)
28760 TRES CANTOS (MADRID), ES
SIDSA SEMIDCONDUCTORES INVESTIGACION Y DISENO, S.A. ( A SOCIEDAD ANONIMA COMPANY)
28760 TRES CANTOS (MADRID), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer chips, namely microelectronic and integrated circuit components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIDSA SEMIDCONDUCTORES INVESTIGACION Y DISENO, S.A. ( A SOCIEDAD ANONIMA COMPANY)
- Other trademarks owned by SIDSA SEMIDCONDUCTORES INVESTIGACION Y DISENO, S.A. ( A SOCIEDAD ANONIMA COMPANY)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FIPSOC THE FIELD PROGRAMMABLE SYSTEM-ON-CHIP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |