USPTO serial 75936553
NEOKISMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2992721Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2005
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEOKISMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paula J. Krasny
PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH DRONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical consultation services in the field of energy power sources based on chemical reactions, for use in batteries and other similar applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |