USPTO serial 75936805
DIRTY BOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRTY BOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsfield, MA
Pittsfield, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sonya del Peral
SONYA DEL PERAL LAW OFFICE OF SONYA DEL PERAL22 PARK ROWCHATHAM, NY 12037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath and body products, namely, soap, skin cleanser, shower gel, bath salts, bath oil, bubble bath, shampoo, hair conditioner, hair gel, body paint, body cream, moisturizer, hand lotion, perfume, cologne, eau de toilette, aromatherapy oils, nail polish, lipstick, lip gloss and non-medicated lip balm | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |