USPTO serial 75936982
ECHO DRAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECHO DRAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irving, TX
Irving, TX
Irving, TX
Irving, TX
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor E. Libert
VICTOR E LIBERT LIBERT & ASSOCIATES3 MILL POND LN POWDER FOREST BUSINESSPARK, P O BOX 538SIMSBURY, CT 06070-0538Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live performances by a musical band | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Libert, Andrew C.
- Other trademarks owned by Libert, Andrew C.
- Other trademarks owned by Visentine, Todd
- Other trademarks owned by Visentine, Todd
- Other trademarks owned by Infante, Ines A.
- Other trademarks owned by Infante, Ines A.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ECHO DRAIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |