USPTO serial 75937084
DELTAVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELTAVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Eustache, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Farfan
133 RICHMOND ST W STE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) image capturing and processing devices and accessories, namely, video cameras, still video cameras, indoor cameras, dummy cameras, video recorders, video recorder mounts and video recorder enclosures, camera domes for concealing cameras, camera dome mounts and mounting brackets and ceiling tile mounts, sold separately or together as integrated video capture, distribution or transmission systems; image capturing and processing devices and accessories, namely, outdoor cameras, camera housings, camera mounts and mounting brackets, display monitors, display monitor mounts and mounting brackets, video switchers, video switcher mounts, video multiplexers, video processors and controllers, integrated video recorders and switchers and mounts therefor, sold separately or together as integrated video capture, distribution or transmission systems; image capturing and processing devices and accessories, namely, video amplifiers, electrical cables and connectors, infrared illuminators, camera heaters and fans, camera lenses, focal length finders, sold separately or together as integrated video capture, distribution or transmission systems, pan and tilt video cameras; (Based on Intent to Use) image capturing and processing devices and accessories, namely, wireless video cameras, video receivers, sold separately or together as integrated video capture, distribution or transmission systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |