USPTO serial 75937538
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allyn Taylor
ALLYN TAYLOR GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1833UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Computer communication services; namely, on-line services providing a communication link to a global computer networks | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Computer system and diagnostic services; computer consultation services in the nature of network and system analysis for classifying and sourcing information and decoding critical relationships between data sources in order to incorporate the collection, storage, manipulation and modeling capabilities of information stored on computer systems and networks; updating of computer software and software design for others; computer network and system design for others; and technical consultation for providing information and mapping relationships and information flow between all potential system levels and components of all potential data sources encompassing data, documents, files, fields, categories, nodes, sectors, databases, structured vocabularies, crosswalks, data or modeling capabilities of the information utilizing computer systems and networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |