USPTO serial 75937553
AIRVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven G. Hill
STEVEN G HILL HILL & KERTSCHER, LLP100 GALLERIA PKWY STE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Data management services to assist health care providers manage their business, namely processing and managing data pertaining to the management of a business, namely risk assessment, risk management, compliance with governmental regulations, enrollment and registration management, bulling and accounts receivable functions, enterprise wide identification and credential verification of employees, affiliates and customers, departmental budgeting, contract management, process improvement, package tracking, and record abstraction | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services to health care providers, patients, and ancillary service providers such as pharmacies, namely, the wireless transmission of video and data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services to health care providers regarding how to use automation, namely, computer networks, for the purpose of communicating, receiving and storing data used by health care providers in the course of administration and patient care, and providing wireless access to a global computer network for the transfer and dissemination of information for use by health care providers, patients and ancillary service providers, and data management service to assist health care providers to process and manage patient data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |