USPTO serial 75937683
VARIABLE TORQUE MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 23, 2002
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with VARIABLE TORQUE MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
Minato-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
TOKYO, JP
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
Minato-Ku, Tokyo 107, JP
Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobile structural parts for sport utility vehicles, namely, a feature of four wheel drive systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
- Other trademarks owned by HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Co., Ltd.)
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named VARIABLE TORQUE MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |