USPTO serial 75937858
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. CILLUFFO
JOSEPH A CILLUFFFO ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103-0001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consulting services, namely consulting in the field of broadcasting via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |