USPTO serial 75937924
CLEAN WATER WORLDWIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEAN WATER WORLDWIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Markham, Ontario L3R 2S1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanne E. Longmuir
JEANNE E LONGMUIR CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP800 SUPERIOR AVE STE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2688UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Water and Wastewater purification units and components for industrial use, namely, degritters, classifiers, flocculators, contactors, carbon contact towers, ion exchange towers; water softening units for industrial use; filtering units for industrial use, namely, gravity and pressure types for use in water and wastewater treatment; heat exchangers for industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |