USPTO serial 75938267
TOOLS & MIDDLEWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOOLS & MIDDLEWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CIRCUIT BOARDS; COAXIAL CABLES; COMPUTER BUFFERS; COMPUTER CABLES; COMPUTER CARRYING CASES; COMPUTER CHIPS; COMPUTER COLOR PRINTER USING HEAT SENSITIVE DRY PRINTING PROCESS; COMPUTER DISC DRIVES; COMPUTER FAX MODEM CARDS; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES; COMPUTER GAME DISCS; COMPUTER GAME EQUIPMENT CONTAINING MEMORY DEVICES NAMELY, DISCS; COMPUTER GAME JOYSTICKS; COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME TAPES; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER INTERFACE BOARDS; COMPUTER KEYBOARDS; COMPUTER MEMORIES; COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTER MOUSE; COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PERlPHERALS; COMPUTER PRINTERS; COMPUTER TERMINALS; COMPUTER UTILITY PROGRAMS; COMPUTERS AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT; COMPUTERS; FIBER OPTIC CABLES; FIBER OPTIC LIGHT AND IMAGE CONDUITS; GAMING MACHINES; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAME PROGRAM; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES OF VIRTUAL REALITY COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; JOYSTICKS FOR VIDEO GAMES; JUMPER CABLES; LASER PRINTERS; LOUDSPEAKERS; MACHINES FOR PLAYING GAMES OF CHANCE; MAGNETIC CODED CARD READERS; MAGNETIC CODED CARDS; MICRO-PROCESSORS; MICROCOMPUTERS; MICROFICHE; MICROMETERS; MINICOMPUTERS; MODEMS; MOTION PICTURE CAMERAS; MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; MUSICAL VIDEO RECORDINGS; OPTICAL DISCS; OPTICAL SCANNERS; SATELLITE PROCESSORS; SATELLITES FOR SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES; SUPERMINI COMPUTERS; TELEVISION ANTENNAS; TELEVISION SETS; VIDEO CAMERAS; VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; VIDEO GAME DISCS; VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE CONTROL FLOOR PADS OR MATS; VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE REMOTE CONTROL UNITS; VIDEO GAME JOYSTICKS; VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; VIDEO GAME TAPE CASSETTES; VIDEO MONITORS; VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS; VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | May 16, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |