Drawing for NOTIFYHEALTH

USPTO serial 75938284

NOTIFYHEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOTIFYHEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY H. HANDAL

ANTHONY H HANDAL HANDAL & MOROFSKY80 WASHINGTON STNORWALK, CT 06854UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communication services, namely, electronic mail services, paging services, video teleconferencing services, providing multiple-user access to global computer networks, cellular telephone services, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network including personal communications services, wireless communications services, ISDN and other commodity transport services, doctor to doctor/ medical personnel/ medical facility/ patient/ physicians' office communications services; performing all of the above communications services with provisions for limiting access or types of access to approved persons or classes of personsACTIVE—
041On-line services, namely, providing a wide range of general interest medical educational information via global computer information networks; providing web sites featuring a wide range of general interest information on conference sites, seminar locales, continuing education centers and medical educational services via global computer information networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance