Drawing for NEW YORK LAWYER

USPTO serial 75938354

NEW YORK LAWYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2545375Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 5, 2002
Examiner
JACOBI, WILLIAM
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NEW YORK LAWYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG PC1628 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD 15TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016legal publications, namely, newspapers and magazines pertaining to the legal fieldSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 24, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2008C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 30, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 10, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Dec 27, 2001CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 26, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance