Drawing for SAIL FOR THE CURE

USPTO serial 75938522

SAIL FOR THE CURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAIL FOR THE CURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHERINE MCCAULEY-LIBERT

MOLLY BUCK RICHARD RICHARD LAW GROUP8411 PRESTON RD STE 890DALLAS, TX 75225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Broadcasting sailboat races via the Internet in order to raise money for medical researchACTIVE—
041Organizing and conducting sailboat races in order to raise money for medical research; entertainment services, namely providing sailboat rides for cancer patients; and educational services, namely conducting classes, workshops, and seminars on the subject of medical researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 6, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 14, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 26, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance