Drawing for MASS PRODUCED. USER DEFINED.

USPTO serial 75938708

MASS PRODUCED. USER DEFINED.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASS PRODUCED. USER DEFINED.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLEY S. CRAIG

LESLIE S CRIAG TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING BUSINESS STATISTICAL INFORMATION; BUSINESS OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS AND ACCOMPANYING SWITCHING STATIONS FOR OTHERSACTIVE—
037CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS AND ACCOMPANYING SWITCHING STATIONSACTIVE—
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, LONG DISTANCE, CELLULAR TELEPHONE AND PAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE AND VIDEO MESSAGES AND DATA; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS AND ACCOMPANYING SWITCHING STATIONS FOR OTHERS; TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 28, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance