USPTO serial 75938745
SHOES DIRECT WWW.SHOESDIRECT.CO.UK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOES DIRECT WWW.SHOESDIRECT.CO.UK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Heybridge, Essex, GB
Heybridge, Essex, GB
Heybridge, Essex, GB
Heybridge, Essex, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel E. Bair
JOEL E BAIR RADER FISHMAN GRAUER & MCGARRY PLLC171 MONROE AVE NW STE 600GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2634UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely pamphlets and leaflets in the field of footwear and clothing; posters and mounted photographs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, sweaters, ties, braces, underwear, blouses, skirts and dresses, coats, trousers; footwear, headwear; T-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets and caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lodge, Philip James
- Other trademarks owned by Lodge, Philip James
- Other trademarks owned by Lodge, Timothy Charles
- Other trademarks owned by Lodge, Timothy Charles
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SHOES DIRECT WWW.SHOESDIRECT.CO.UK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |