Drawing for Serial No. 75938798

USPTO serial 75938798

Serial No. 75938798

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75938798?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jean-Marc Zimmerman

226 ST PAUL STWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003GUN CLEANING SOLVENTSACTIVE—
004GUN LUBRICATING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY GUN OIL AND GUN GREASEINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
008KNIVES, NAMELY HUNTING, FISHING AND SPORTING KNIVESACTIVE—
013SHOT GUNS, RIFLES, SHOT GUN AMMUNITION, RIFLE AMMUNITION, GUN CASES, GUN SLINGS AND AMMUNITION SHELL BAGSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY JACKETS, SHIRTS, NECK TIES, PANTS, HATS, VESTS AND BOOTSACTIVE—
028CLAY PIGEONS FOR TARGET SHOOTINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 7, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 4, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Apr 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 21, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Dec 10, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance