USPTO serial 75938798
Serial No. 75938798
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75938798?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bernardsville, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jean-Marc Zimmerman
226 ST PAUL STWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | GUN CLEANING SOLVENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | GUN LUBRICATING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY GUN OIL AND GUN GREASE | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 008 | KNIVES, NAMELY HUNTING, FISHING AND SPORTING KNIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | SHOT GUNS, RIFLES, SHOT GUN AMMUNITION, RIFLE AMMUNITION, GUN CASES, GUN SLINGS AND AMMUNITION SHELL BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY JACKETS, SHIRTS, NECK TIES, PANTS, HATS, VESTS AND BOOTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | CLAY PIGEONS FOR TARGET SHOOTING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Griffin & Howe, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |