USPTO serial 75938820
MOMO'S VEGGIE KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2004
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOMO'S VEGGIE KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond, British Columbia, V6J 2C9, CA
Richmond, British Columbia, V6J 2C9, CA
Richmond, British Columbia, V6J 2C9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin E. Leace
BENJAMIN E LEACE RATNER & PRESTIAONE WESTLAKES BERWYN STE 301P O BOX 980VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0980Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | VEGETABLE-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, VEGETABLE-BASED MILK SUBSTITUTE MADE FROM SOYBEANS, NAMELY, SOY MILK; TOFU, CANNED OR DRIED SOYBEAN CURD; SOYBEAN-BASED FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, VEGETABLE PATTIES, VEGETABLE WIENERS, VEGETABLE SAUSAGES, SOYBEAN-BASED MEAT AND FISH SUBSTITUTES, NAMELY, SIMULATED CHICKEN, BEEF, PORK, FISH AND SIMULATED ANIMAL INNARDS, NAMELY HEARTS, KIDNEY, LIVER, TRIPE AND PATE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | ICE CREAM AND FROZEN YOGURT, NON-DAIRY NOODLES AND PASTA; VEGETABLE DUMPLINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | SOY-BEAN BASED NON-CARBONATED, NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, FRUIT AND VEGETABLE JUICE BEVERAGES, CONCENTRATES FOR MAKING NON-CARBONATED AND NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT AND VEGETABLE JUICE BEVERAGES, EXTRACTS OF FRUITS AND SOYBEANS FOR MAKING NON-ALCOHOLIC, NON-CARBONATED DRINKS, NAMELY, FRUIT AND VEGETABLE JUICE BEVERAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Momo's Kitchen Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Momo's Kitchen Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Momo's Kitchen Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MOMO'S VEGGIE KITCHEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 4, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |