Drawing for ISLAND ENTERTAINMENT

USPTO serial 75939506

ISLAND ENTERTAINMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISLAND ENTERTAINMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041MOTION PICTURE PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION IN ALL MEDIA; ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, PREPARATION OF MOTION PICTURE SPECIAL EFFECTS; RENTAL OF MOTION PICTURES; SCREENPLAY WRITING SERVICES; PREPRODUCTION AND POSTPRODUCTION OF MOTION PICTURES; MOVIE THEATER SERVICES; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF A FILM FESTIVAL; CASINO SERVICES; PRODUCTION OF MOTION PICTURES FOR INCORPORATION INTO VIDEO-ON-DEMAND, INTERACTIVE MEDIA, DIGITAL VIDEO, DIGITAL INTERACTIVE GAMES, STREAMING MEDIA AND FOR DISTRIBUTION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR OTHER ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKSACTIVEFeb 19, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 11, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 10, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 17, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 21, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 1, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance