USPTO serial 75939543
GADFLY MAGAZINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2786803Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2003
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GADFLY MAGAZINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES J. KNICELY
JAMES J. KNICELY KNICELY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.487 MCLAWS CIRCLE #2WILLIAMSBURG, VA 23185UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Series of pre-recorded cd-roms, videotapes and films providing commentary on public beliefs, literature, television, film and the arts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rutherford Institute, The
- Other trademarks owned by Rutherford Institute, The
- Other trademarks owned by Rutherford Institute, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GADFLY MAGAZINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |